perspectivecommon ground
“
Both sides agree that terrorism is difficult to define universally and that violence by both states and non-state actors can cause terror. They concur that studying all forms of political violence critically is important. The debate centers on whether to label state violence as terrorism or treat it under different concepts like repression or counterinsurgency, with overlap in empirical facts acknowledged.
controversy
Supporting arguments
- Violence from states and non-state actors can both terrorize civilians.
- Definitions of terrorism are contested and politically charged.
- Interdisciplinary study benefits understanding of political violence.
Read the full exploration