From: Epistemology: The Rules of Knowing
evidenceobservational

Epistemological justification is divided between foundationalism, which relies on basic self-evident beliefs, and coherentism, which holds that beliefs are justified by fitting together.

30% confidence

Foundationalists argue that our knowledge rests on a base of self-evident truths that need no further proof. Coherentists disagree, comparing knowledge to a web where beliefs support each other. If a new belief fits neatly with everything else we believe, it is justified.

Read the full exploration
What else is in this exploration
3 perspectives2 visualizations2 insights10 media resources4 rabbit holes
evidence
Edmund Gettier proved that a person can have a justified true belief without actually possessing ...
evidence
Traditional epistemology defines knowledge as 'justified true belief,' requiring three distinct c...
perspective
Skepticism poses a radical challenge: perhaps we cannot truly know anything at all. Skeptics poin...
Sign up to unlock
Continue exploring
Epistemology: The Rules of Knowing
Evidence, perspectives, rabbit holes, and more