How do you personally define 'greatness' in any field, and what biases might influence your judgment?

The GOAT debate highlights our own internal criteria for evaluating excellence. Reflecting on what we value most – raw talent, consistency, leadership, or cultural impact – can reveal our biases and help us understand why others hold different opinions. This exercise can be applied to judging artists, leaders, or innovators, fostering a more nuanced understanding of complex achievements.