To what extent should we prioritize empirical evidence over personal intuition or spiritual belief when interpreting human experience?

This question delves into the fundamental tension between scientific methodology and subjective experience. While science demands verifiable, repeatable evidence, many human experiences, particularly those related to spirituality or intuition, resist such quantification. Pondering this helps one define their own epistemic boundaries—where they draw the line between what is 'known' through data and what is 'felt' or 'believed' through other means. It's a crucial reflection in an increasingly complex world where diverse ways of knowing often clash.